specialOpsGuys

special ops to get more funding, expanded mission

Over in the House, the Emerging Threats and Capabilities subcommittee of the House Armed Services Committee is marking up its version of next year’s defense bill on Wednesday. And chairman Mac Thornberry (R-Tex.) is making sure that it strengthens the special operations role in counterterrorism for years to come.

The “mark,” as it’s called in Hill-speak, wants the U.S. Special Operations Command to consider changing its command structure to “better support development and deployment of joint special operations forces and capabilities.” Expect that to strengthen the role of the Joint Special Operations Command (JSOC), responsible for killing bin Laden, especially as the next spec ops chief will be JSOC’s leader, Vice Adm. William McRaven.

Better still for the command, Thornberry’s mark asks it to examine “future requirements” for its role in counterterrorism, and provide Congress with what it will need to “support special operations counterterrorism, unconventional warfare, and irregular warfare” ahead of a scheduled expiration of authorities in fiscal 2014. The command’s cash for counterterrorism missions will go up to $50 million under the bill, a modest increase of $5 million.

In return, Congress just wants to be kept in the loop. The mark seeks “quarterly” briefings to the defense oversight committees on counterterrorism operations worldwide, as well as an “outline of interagency activities and initiatives” — in other words, missions pairing it with the CIA, a la Abbottabad.

“We are well aware that it was Special Operations Forces that conducted the operation on Osama bin Laden earlier this week,” Thornberry said Wednesday. “They deserve our thanks and our support, and from this subcommittee they get it.”

Not just from that subcommittee. Since 9/11, Special Operations Command’s budget has nearly tripled (PDF), with the Obama administration requesting $10.5 billion for the next fiscal year. Adm. Eric Olson, the outgoing commander, recently marveled at Congress’ support for special operations — but warned that commandos are run ragged by their frequent deployments.

A quick for-instance: if you think that fast-roping from helicopters down into bin Laden’s compound was impressive, consider that JSOC forces “conduct these kinds of operations two and three times a night in Afghanistan,” as CIA Director Leon Panetta — nominated to be the next secretary of defense — told PBS’ Jim Lehrer on Tuesday.

There are lots of congressional hurdles to jump through before Thornberry’s mark reaches Obama’s desk. But it’s doubtful that after the success of the bin Laden operation anyone on the Hill is going to want to rein in special operations. Thornberry’s Democratic counterpart, James Langevin of Rhode Island, predicted that the role of the elite troops “will only grow and we must continue to make supporting them a central aspect to our national security strategy.”

Photo: U.S. Army

Chris Douglas-Roberts offers different perspective on death of Osama bin Laden – NBA – Sporting News

While America celebrates the assassination of Osama bin Laden, Bucks wing Chris Douglas-Roberts has his own take on bin Laden’s death and the wars being fought in the Middle East. And he’s under intense, even threatening, scrutiny from many of his followers on Twitter for his stance.

“Is this a celebration??,” Douglas-Roberts tweeted after hearing the news of bin Laden’s death.

Bucks wing Chris Douglas-Roberts, pictured here when he played for the Nets, is drawing criticism for his reaction to Osama bin Laden’s death. (AP photo)

His next tweet: “Is this the beginning of a huge religious war? I hope not. (shaking my head).”

A follower of Douglas-Roberts responded, “@CDOUGLASROBERTS of course it’s a f—— celebration,moron….he killed nearly 3,000 Americans”

Douglas-Roberts replied, “I’m the moron. Are you a Christian. Would God be happy with you celebrating death? Or is your religion, ‘American’?

Roberts, through a series of tweets, went on to stress his anti-war position in the context of the killing of Bin Laden.

“It took 919,967 deaths to kill that one guy.

“It took 10 years & 2 Wars to kill that…guy.

“It cost us (USA) roughly $1,188,263,000,000 to kill that………..guy. But we #winning though. Haaaa. (Sarcasm).”

With more negative reaction being tweeted at Dougles-Roberts, he went on to clarify his position.

“What I’m sayin has nothing to do with 9/11 or that guy (Bin Laden). I still feel bad for the 9/11 families but I feel EQUALLY bad for the war families. …

“People are telling me to get out of America now b/c I’m against MORE INNOCENT people dying everyday? B/c I’m against a 10 year WAR?

“Whatever happened to our freedom of speech? That’s the problem. We don’t want to hear anything that isn’t our perspective.”

via Chris Douglas-Roberts offers different perspective on death of Osama bin Laden – NBA – Sporting News.